|
The taxonomy of the cone snails and their allies as proposed by John K. Tucker and Manuel J. Tenorio in 2009 was a biological classification system for a large group of predatory sea snails. This system was an attempt to make taxonomic sense of the large and diverse group which contains the family Conidae, the cone snails.〔Tucker J.K. & Tenorio M.J. (2009) Systematic classification of Recent and fossil conoidean gastropods. Hackenheim: Conchbooks. 296 pp., at p. 133〕 The authors proposed extensive changes to the family Conidae in contrast to the way the group was treated in the taxonomy of the Gastropoda by Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005. Bouchet and Rocroi included in the family Conidae several other groups of toxoglossan snails which had previously been placed in the Turridae. For the over 600 recognized species of living cone snails, Tucker and Tenorio’s classification system proposed 3 distinct families and 82 genera. The authors discussed in detail 89 genera and five families in total (that have the inner shell walls resorbed during growth), including fossil cone snail genera and snails which were previously traditionally classified as turrids. This classification was based upon shell morphology, radular differences, anatomy, physiology, cladistics, and an analysis of then published molecular phylogeny (DNA) studies. The genera proposed by Tucker and Tenorio are recognized as an "alternate representation" by the World Register of Marine Species. The authors further proposed a modification to the classification of Bouchet & Rocroi (2005) for ten additional Conoidea families (which do not resorb their inner walls) which included turrids which had been placed in the Conidae by Taylor, ''et al.'' in 1993.〔Taylor, J.D, Kantor, Yu. I. & Sysoev, A.V. (1993) ''Foregut anatomy, feeding mechanisms, relationships and classification of the Conoidea (=Toxoglossa)(Gastropoda).'' Bulletin of Natural History Museum of London Zoology 59:125-170.〕 This proposed taxonomic classification separated the turrid snails from the cone snails, which were considered to be a distinct and diverse group. ==Cone snails and the genus problem== In 1758, Linnaeus, working only with shells, placed all the cone snails in a single genus ''Conus''. In 1792, three genera were proposed by Hwass, five genera were proposed by Montfort in 1810, and then six genera by Kiener in 1845. In 1874, H.C. Weinkauff proposed a system of seventeen genera for the 352 then-known species of cones. This system of classification was adopted by G. W. Tryon in 1884.〔Weinkauff, H.C. (1873-1875) ''Die Familie der Coneae oder Conidae.'' Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz. Bauer & Raspe, Nurenberg, Vol. 4(2):125-244.〕〔Tryon, G.W., Jr. (1884) Conidae, Pleurotomidae. ''Manual of Conchology, structural and systematic, with illustrations of the species.'' Tryon, Philadelphia, Vol. 6:1-413; Pls. 1-31 (Conidae).〕 In the 1930s, Iredale proposed several new genera, followed by B. C. Cotton in 1945, with twenty-nine genera.〔Cotton, B.C. (1945) ''A catalogue of the cone shells (Conidae) in the South Australian Museum.'' Records of the South Australian Museum 8:229-280, 5 pls.〕 From 1956 onwards, Kuroda and other Japanese scientists introduced several additional new genera.〔Kuroda, T. (1956) ''New species of the Conidae (Gastropoda) from Japan.'' Venus 19(1):1-15, pl. 1.〕 Ultimately dozens of genera and subgenera were being used. In 1937, J.R. Tomlin advocated that all cone snail species should be placed in the single genus ''Conus'' in the family Conidae, with the explanation that "the grouping of the Cones is as yet so little understood that I have made no attempt to deal with the growing number of subgenera and genera into which ''Conus'' has been dismembered."〔Tomlin, J.R. le B. (1937) ''Catalogue of Recent and fossil cones.'' Proceedings of the Malacological Socitey of London 22:205-330.〕 In 1979, Jerry G. Walls emulated Tomlin by confining all species to the genus ''Conus'', stating that "although many subgenera or genera have been devised for the cones, only the single genus ''Conus'' with no subgenera is recognized here."〔Jerry G. Walls (1979) ''Cone Shells a Synopsis of the Living Conidae'' published by T.F.H. Publications, Inc., Neptune City, New Jersey. Pages 1-1011, at p. 31.〕 Subsequent experts in the field of cone snail taxonomy followed Tomlin and Walls, and retained all species of cones in the single genus ''Conus'', making the Conidae a monogeneric family. This traditional Linnaean classification system, placing all species of cones in the single genus ''Conus'', continued for decades before a malacologist proposed a different classification system. In 1991, A.J. da Motta published a new systematic classification of cone species at the generic level, incorporating all taxa previously named by other authors.〔A.J. da Motta (1991) ''A Systematic Classification of the Gastropod Family Conidae at the Generic Level'' published by La Conchiglia. 48 pp.〕 A.J. da Motta’s classification system, which covered both extant and fossil species, was based primarily on the shape and contours of the body whorl of the shell, and attempted to make generic classification of cones possible in an objective manner. This 1991 proposed classification used eight existing genera,''Conus'', ''Leptoconus'', ''Dendroconus'', ''Hermes'', ''Profundiconus'', ''Gastridium'', ''Conasprella'', and ''Cylinder'', and sixty subgenera. A.J. da Motta's proposed classification was however not generally accepted. The last comprehensive treatise dealing with the family Conidae as a whole was the "Manual of the Living Conidae", by Röckel, Korn & Kohn (1995). Only one genus, ''Conus'', was used for the entire family, the authors stating that they considered there was still insufficient scientific data at that time to accurately define the diversity of the family.〔Röckel, D., Korn, W., & Kohn, A. (1995) ''Manual of the Living Conidae, Volume 1: Indo-Pacific Region.'' Christa Hemmen, Wiesbaden, 517 pp.〕 The Conus Biodiversity Website, by Alan J. Kohn and Trevor Anderson, notes that there are more than 500 recognized extant species of ''Conus'', out of 3,253 species names published between 1758 and 2007. As of the date of The Conus Biodiversity Website's last update in October 2007, only the genus ''Conus'' is recognized for the entire family.〔http://biology.burke.washington.edu/conus/ The Conus Biodiversity Website, updated through October 2007.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Taxonomy of the Conoidea (Tucker & Tenorio, 2009)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|